UK: 'Argentina poses no credible military threat to Malvinas'

On the verge of the Malvinas War 30th anniversary, the UK’s Defence Secretary Philip Hammond said that the Islands “do not face a current credible military threat from Argentina”, and remembered that “Argentine Mirage air-combat fighters do not represent a real menace to the Islands, which are well defended by the way too powerful RAF Typhoon jets.” 

British broadsheet newspaper “The Times” published today Hammond's remarks, in that there was no need to increase the British military deployment to the islands despite an increase in tensions between Britain and Argentina.

“People must remember that Argentina hasn’t bought a single combat jet since 1982, hence they still have the old Mirage jets used during the armed conflict. On the contrary, we [UK] have air superiority as we count with Typhoons jets, which are the most advanced combat aircrafts in the world, with the air base located at the very same Islands.”

Likewise, Hammond stressed that Britain had “no desire or intention to increase the heat,” and added, “We have no evidence whatsoever that Argentina has the necessary capacity and/or strength to lead a military intervention in the Islands.” 

Among rumours that went from little to ridiculous like the ones published by British sensationalist media indicating that the Islands are on red alert amid concerns Argentine veterans will try to "reclaim" the islands during next week's 30th anniversary of the armed conflict; Hammond came to cold thing off.

“There is no evidence of any current credible military threat to the security of the Islands and therefore no current plan for significant changes to force deployments.”

Anyway, the British official justified all military presence in the archipelago: “However, Her Majesty’s Government is committed to defending the right of the islanders to self-determination and plans exist for rapid reinforcement of the land, sea and air forces in and around the islands, should any such threat appear.”

Hammond added that the UK’s Government was “quite confident” that it had sufficient naval assets in the area and the ability to reinforce those assets “should there be any evidence of intent to any form of attack.”