Saturday
September 20, 2014

On Monday

Saturday, April 19, 2014

Government’s fight with hedge funds reaches US top court

WASHINGTON — The US Supreme Court on Monday wades into Argentina’s multi-billion dollar legal fight with bond investors who turned down two debt restructuring offers after the country’s 2002 default.

The relatively narrow case that the nine justices are due to hear concerns whether the investors can force banks in New York with which Argentina does business to disclose information about the country’s non-US assets as the investors seek repayment.

The case is in some ways the appetizer, with the main course in the no-holds-barred litigation yet to come. A bigger case, in which Argentina is challenging a court judgment ordering it to pay US$1.33 billion to the so-called “holdout” bond investors or face a potential default if it refuses to do so, waits in the wings.

The high court could decide in June whether to take up the bigger case. It would not be argued or decided until the court’s next term beginning in October and ending in June 2015.

The government has been battling for a decade with the bondholders led by hedge funds NML Capital Ltd, a unit of billionaire Paul Singer’s Elliott Management Corp, and Aurelius Capital Management. Argentina argues the funds bought most of the debt at a deep discount after the default and sought to thwart the country’s efforts to restructure. Creditors holding about 93 percent of Argentina’s bonds agreed to participate in two debt swaps in 2005 and 2010, accepting between 25 and 29 cents on the dollar.

Although the two cases present different legal questions, both broadly concern the scope of sovereign immunity, which is the legal principle that sets limits on when nation states can be sued. The bond investors have embraced a litigation strategy that aims to circumvent those limits.

Theodore Olson, a lawyer for NML, said both cases were about “Argentina’s default on its obligations and its refusal for decades to honour those legally binding obligations which it voluntarily incurred in order to raise capital in American financial markets.”

Equal treatment

A ruling on Monday’s case is expected by late June. Observers on both sides will be watching the argument and the ruling for clues as to how the justices will act on Argentina’s second case, referred to as the pari passu case. Pari passu clauses, routinely included in the contracts that govern the sale of debt, require equal treatment of investors.

The pari passu case could have implications for other countries facing defaults and the bond market as a whole, according to Brett House, a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation, a think tank based in Waterloo, Ontario. A ruling against Argentina could have a damaging effect on New York’s role as an issuer of bonds, House said.

“They don’t want to issue debt if it can come back and bite them,” he said.

Ships and satellites

The case being argued on Monday concerns NML’s efforts to enforce US court judgments it already has won against Argentina. The only way it can enforce the judgments is by tracking down Argentina’s assets in the United States and elsewhere.

NML says it has won judgments worth about US$1.7 billion but it has had little success in seizing assets as the legal process is convoluted and is resolved on a case-by-case basis.

Among the assets NML has tried to seize so far are an Argentine frigate that was docked in Ghana and a contract for launch slots at the SpaceX private satellite launch site in California.

In the matter before the high court, the question is whether NML could enforce subpoenas against Bank of America Corp BAC.N and Banco de la Nación Argentina seeking information about Argentina’s non-US assets

In court papers, Argentina’s lawyers say that its sovereign immunity, as outlined in a federal law called the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, extends to the type of information NML is seeking via the subpoenas.

Reuters

  • Increase font size Decrease font sizeSize
  • Email article
    email
  • Print
    Print
  • Share
    1. Vote
    2. Not interesting Little interesting Interesting Very interesting Indispensable






  • Increase font size Decrease font size
  • mail
  • Print




Grupo ámbito ámbito financiero ambito.com Docsalud AlRugby.com Premium El Ciudadano El Tribuno Management

Director: Orlando Mario Vignatti - Edition No. 4257 - This publication is a property of NEFIR S.A. -RNPI Nº 5177376 - Issn 1852 - 9224 - Te. 4349-1500 - San Juan 141 , (C1063ACY) CABA