Saturday
October 25, 2014
Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Emerging markets seem as vulnerable to contagion as ever

A man rides his bicycle past the Central Bank in Buenos Aires.
By Sujata Rao, Daniel Bases & Vidya Ranganathan
Reuters (*)

‘We have seen this movie before,’ says an analyst

LONDON/NEW YORK/SINGAPORE — Emerging markets may be unrecognizable from the small and fragile economies that fell like dominoes 15 years ago, but they are just as vulnerable today to the same sort of indiscriminate selling when investor panic sets in.

As even the relatively robust economies of Mexico and Poland now feel the heat from disparate flashpoints from Turkey to Argentina, there are growing doubts that emerging markets have built any immunity to such contagion.

The wildfire engulfing the developing world is starting to look very like the currency runs of the past, such as the Asian, Russian and Latin American collapses that began in 1997.

Dominic Rossi, Global CIO for equities at fund manager Fidelity, likens the current wave of plunging currencies, equities and bonds to watching an old film —one in which some of the biggest emerging markets could feature.

“We’ve seen this movie before,” he said. “One emerging country after another gets left stranded on the shore as the tide goes out. The weakest ones first, Argentina and Turkey, soon to be followed by Brazil, Russia and others.”

Emerging markets have been inflated in recent years by huge amounts of cheap cash created by the US Federal Reserve, much if which found its way into developing economies in the hunt for better returns. With the Fed scaling back the programme, that flow is reversing and the currencies of countries with the biggest economic and political problems — notably Argentina and Turkey — are diving.

Investors’ behaviour may not have changed all that much from during the past crises, even though many emerging economies now have more flexible currencies and trillions of dollars in foreign exchange reserves. There are three main reasons why these markets could again suffer the capital flight that plagued them during the 1990s.

First is the scale of money that has moved to developing markets over the past decade and now dwarfs the sums which fled in panic 15 years ago.

Secondly, lending into emerging markets has increasingly been through bond markets, rather than in the direct bank loans that dominated previously and which involved longer-term relationships between banks and the firms and countries.

Thirdly, the emergence of index-tracking Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) over the past decade has arguably increased the indiscriminate nature of emerging market inflows, leaving them ever more vulnerable to lockstep withdrawals.

So for all the transformation of emerging economies, their higher credit ratings, superior balance sheets and infrastructure, investors still tend to lump developing countries together when markets sell off, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein told Reuters Television.

Blankfein said people who carefully weighed one investment against another when entering a market, were much less discriminating when departing in haste.

“When times are good emerging markets are like a credit business, name by name,” he said. “When things get bad, forget the names, it’s a macro event. Forget the differences, they are all emerging markets.”

Tidal wave

Emerging markets have attracted about US$7 trillion since 2005 through a mix of direct investment in manufacturing and services, mergers and acquisitions, and investment in stocks and bonds, the Institute for International Finance estimates.

JPMorgan estimates outstanding emerging market bonds at US$10 trillion compared with just US$422 billion in 1993. Assets of funds benchmarked to emerging debt indices stand at US$603 billion, more than double 2007 levels, it said, and over US$1.3 trillion now follows MSCI’s main emerging equity index.

Mutual fund data from Lipper, a ThomsonReuters service, shows that in the past 10 years net inflows into debt and equity markets was in the region of US$412 billion.

Significantly, there have been few major hiccups in emerging economies in that period, and only in the global crisis year of 2008 and in 2013 were there any net redemptions, Lipper showed.

The result, many say, is a recipe for fund redemptions snowballing when returns fall below a certain level.

Losses in one or two markets can leave managers with no choice but to liquidate other positions to protect the fund’s net asset value (NAV), the main indicator of how profitable a fund is relative to its assets.

But emerging markets’ inherent volatility may have been exacerbated by the explosion in popularity of ETFs, many people believe. Assets of emerging equity ETFs tracked by EPFR Global ballooned to a peak of almost US$300 billion, tripling since 2008 and up from next to nothing in 2004.

These cheaper and highly liquid vehicles, unlike mutual funds, update prices through the day, adding another layer of price swings to a volatile trading session.

ETFs accounted for almost half the US$2.5 billion outflows from emerging equities last week. So far this year, a net US$4.12 billion has flowed out, amounting to three quarters of the total US$5.7 billion that has fled, the fund tracker said.

  • Increase font size Decrease font sizeSize
  • Email article
    email
  • Print
    Print
  • Share
    1. Vote
    2. Not interesting Little interesting Interesting Very interesting Indispensable






22
  • Increase font size Decrease font size
  • mail
  • Print




Grupo ámbito ámbito financiero ambito.com Docsalud AlRugby.com Premium El Ciudadano El Tribuno Management

Director: Orlando Mario Vignatti - Edition No. 4291 - This publication is a property of NEFIR S.A. -RNPI Nº 5177376 - Issn 1852 - 9224 - Te. 4349-1500 - San Juan 141 , (C1063ACY) CABA