April 16, 2014

Such reasonableness almost certainly will not last

Sunday, December 15, 2013

Republicans buck the purity police

House Speaker John Boehner vehemently rebukes conservative groups who oppose the pending bipartisan budget compromise.
By Dana Milbank
Washington Post

Much is wrong with the deal to fund the government for the next 21 months. It does nothing to address Medicare, change the inefficient and illogical tax code or extend unemployment benefits.

WASHINGTON — House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), addressing the cameras after his weekly meeting with House Republicans, was his usual, courtly self Wednesday morning — until Nancy Cordes of CBS News found her way under his tanned skin.

“Mr. Speaker, most major conservative groups have put out statements blasting this deal,” she said of the compromise that House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin, reached Tuesday night with Senate Democrats.

Boehner interrupted her. “You mean the groups that came out and opposed it before they ever saw it?” he asked.

“Yes, those groups,” she said.

Boehner raised his voice. “They — they’re using our members and they’re using the US people for their own goals,” he said. “This is ridiculous!”

Yes, it is. And the fact that Republicans finally realize it means that Ryan’s budget compromise can be called a success, even if it accomplishes little else.

Much is wrong with the deal to fund the government for the next 21 months. It does nothing to address Medicare and Social Security, which are the long-term problems threatening the nation’s finances. It doesn’t change the inefficient and illogical tax code. It doesn’t extend unemployment benefits, and it doesn’t even fully replace the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration, which is what negotiators had set out to do in the first place. Essentially, lawmakers reached agreement by jettisoning everything consequential.

And yet Ryan achieved something monumental: he persuaded his fellow conservatives to compromise, even though they are under pressure to oppose the pact from powerful groups such as Club for Growth, Heritage Action and Americans for Prosperity that oust Republicans in primaries if they are insufficiently doctrinaire. (The Washington Post reported Wednesday that conservative lawmakers fired a staffer who had been working with outside groups to build opposition to Ryan’s agreement.)

This should give the public, and the markets, a modicum of reassurance that Washington can still handle the simple task of keeping the government running. And this first-time willingness among conservatives to buck the ideological purity police is a small ray of hope that their bravery will repeat itself on other occasions.

“I’m one of the most conservative of the caucus, and I’m leaning yes on this,” Representative John Fleming, R-Louisiana, told reporters in a Capitol basement corridor after leaving the House Republicans’ meeting. “I’m not sure that the outside groups are going to be able to influence us away from what really is a good step in the right direction.”

Fleming, among the Tea Party faithful in the House, said he didn’t hear “any major objections” among colleagues. “We’ve actually found a compromise that does not assault the values of either side,” he said.

Not all of the sans-culottes in the Republican-led House were pacified. “It’s an incredibly small baby step. I’m likely to vote against it,” said Representative Matt Salmon, R-Arizona. “We did nothing on Social Security and Medicare.”

Representative Tim Huelskamp, R-Kansas, likewise, called it a “typical” Washington deal, saying, “It’s going to increase the deficit, it’s going to raise taxes and fees and it’s not going to address the long-term overspending problem in Washington.”

But the agreement returns discretionary spending to 2007 levels in 2015, it gives at least lip service to reducing entitlement spending, and it softens the worst effects of the sequester cuts. Above all, it’s going to restore a sense that Congress can handle the most basic functions of writing budgets and paying bills. That’s not saying much, yet it’s a significant improvement on the way things have been done in recent years.

“We’ve got to find a way to make this divided government work,” Ryan said Wednesday, standing with Boehner and other House GOP leaders. “We understand in this divided government, we’re not going to get everything we want.”

The conclusion would seem obvious. But for Ryan, a profile in intransigence the last several years, this was a major change. And some of the most ardent conservatives were swayed by the former vice presidential nominee.

Representative Pete Sessions, R-Texas, said Ryan told the Republicans “a great story about what we are trying to accomplish on behalf of the US people... making sure the US people understand we have adults in Washington who can deal with big problems.”

Representative Charlie Dent, R-Pennsylvania, said with their compromise, Republicans “are showing the US people we have the capacity for governance.”

But what about the obsession with repealing Obamacare above all else? “Not even mentioned,” said Representative Buck McKeon, R-California.

Such reasonableness almost certainly will not last. But let’s savoor the moment.

  • Increase font size Decrease font sizeSize
  • Email article
  • Print
  • Share
    1. Vote
    2. Not interesting Little interesting Interesting Very interesting Indispensable

  • Increase font size Decrease font size
  • mail
  • Print

Grupo ámbito ámbito financiero Docsalud Premium El Ciudadano El Tribuno Management

Director: Orlando Mario Vignatti - Edition No. 4102 - This publication is a property of NEFIR S.A. - RNPI Nº 5099332 - Issn 1852 - 9224 - Te. 4349-1500 - San Juan 141 , (C1063ACY) CABA